Embedded C Coding Standard Michael Barr
Publisher: CreateSpace

One of my conclusions is that it would be very helpful to C language portability issues. C/C++ compilers have a standard-given right to exploit undefined behaviors in order to generate better code. Differing length of int, bit field ordering, size and capability of pointers, etc. Suggest strategies for how to handle these types of things. This article describes a fast and portable memcpy implementation that can replace the standard library version of memcpy when higher performance is needed. They keep getting better and better at this. I've be thinking a lot about what things would make the book more accessible, particularly to the C-only, embedded-only crowd. This makes a coding standard similar in purpose to the English standard known as Strunk & White (The Elements of Style). See for example strcpy() in the standard library, which prevents the source string being modified. I am programming C in an embedded target. This would probably include coding standard conventions for new code. This library supports input, output, mathematical functions and time values, etc. When looking at his One of the biggest advantages in the original implementation was that the C code was made to imitate the instruction sets on the target processor. Due to the @bash.d, safety standards prevent us from using dynamic memory. C language uses C Standard Library. A coding standard defines a set of rules for programmers to follow in a given language. This implementation His implementation was faster than many standardized C library routines found in the embedded market. Over the summer I happened across a brief blog post by another firmware developer in which he presented ten C coding rules for better embedded C code.